More ODF FUD from Microsoft or its apparent affiliates
Read more »Fresh OpenDocument Deception
Category: Opposition Tags:
- Login to post comments
New F-Spot/Banshee Ties Pose a Microsoft Patent Threat
How F-spot would force Ubuntu, for example, to adopt more Mono applications with non-ECMA .NET components
Read more »- Login to post comments
The Ukraine’s GNU/Linux Ambitions and Microsoft’s MOU Response
A look at how Microsoft responds to the Ukraine's desire for autonomy with Free software
Read more »Category: Government Tags:
- Login to post comments
Background on the new Microsoft code
This saga started when one of the user's on the Vyatta forum inquired about supporting Hyper-V network driver in the Vyatta kernel. [...] The driver [initially] had both open-source components which were under GPL, and statically linked to several binary parts.
Read more »Novell’s Contributions to Linux Drop Sharply
Category: Opposition Tags:
- Login to post comments
GPL and Stallman FUD Now Arriving from the Freedom-apathetic or Freedom-hostile
Microsoft, Novell and Apple fanfare proves challenging to GNU/FSF; the OSI may also face a new hurdle
Read more »Category: Opposition Tags:
- Login to post comments
What Nessus Teaches About Mono
"THE more things change, the more they stay the same," claims one of our readers, who prefers to remain anonymous. "Got .Nessus in your country's infrastructure?" is the question he asks when suggesting that Microsoft is trying to poison the GNU/Linux operating system so as to gain more control over it because Free software takes over at the expense of Microsoft.
Read more »Category: Opposition Tags:
FSF: FOSS developers "still should not write software that depends on Mono"
The Free Software Foundation has issued another statement on Mono, C# after the recent Microsoft extension of the terms of their Community Promise to implementations of ECMA 334 and 335. Is is safe to go back in the water now, as so many have been saying? FSF says no, that the "promise is full of loopholes, and it's nowhere near enough to make C# safe."
Read more »- Login to post comments
Microsoft signs Linux patent deal with Buffalo Tech
Linux users take note: Microsoft has signed another patent licensing agreement with a Linux using vendor. In this new case, Microsoft has signed a deal with Melco Group the group that owns tech vendor Buffalo Technology.
Read more »Category: Opposition Tags:
- Login to post comments
How Microsoft Sabotages GNU/Linux Adoption in Russian Schools
Microsoft uses government funds to spread Microsoft dependency and also sabotages GNU/Linux migrations by advocating unlicensed Windows (which later they will whine about)
Read more »Category: Opposition Tags:
- Login to post comments
How Microsoft Daemonises the EU Commission and Advertises Vista 7, with the MSBBC’s Help
The BBC practically advertises Vista 7 at the expense of TV licensees; BBC reporter also spins for Microsoft and against the European Commission.
Read more »Category: Opposition Tags:
- Login to post comments
Microsoft Exploits Feynman Lectures to Spread Lock-in, Does the Same in HPC
In another assault on open access and free (libre) science, Feynman's work is being seized by a proprietary software vendor and wrapped in proprietary formats.
Read more »Category: Opposition Tags:
- Login to post comments
Microsoft Patent Aggression Continues against Free Software
There has been so much talk in the last two weeks that Microsoft has changed with regard to its patent policy toward Free Software. We fool ourselves if we trust any of the window-dressing that Microsoft has put forward to convince us that we can trust them in this regard.
Read more »Category: Opposition Tags:
Confirmed: Novell Puts Mono (and Moonlight) at Centre of the GNU/Linux Desktop
YESTERDAY we wrote about Moonlight and Mono-based applications getting more tightly integrated. We now see it confirmed by Novell employees Miguel de Icaza and Jonathan Pobst [1 2], so our suspicions were correct from the very start.
Read more »Category: Opposition Tags:
Microsoft's Empty Promise
FSF: Last week, Microsoft extended the terms of their Community Promise to implementations of the ECMA 334 and 335 standards. You might think this means it's safe to write your software in C#. However, this promise is full of loopholes, and it's nowhere near enough to make C# safe.
Read more »- Login to post comments


