In practical terms, developers use GPL v2 and GPL v3 if they want their software to be free and open and to remain free and open no matter how the code is used downstream. It can get more complicated than this, of course, especially since the copyright holder of GPL v2-licensed code, for example, can sell it and even use it in closed-source
Read more »
Open source licensing: the right (or wrong) tool for the job
http://www.businessreviewonline.com –
The big news for today is definitely open source licensing, with SugarCRM going GPLv3, the OSI approving SocialText’s Common Public Attribution License, BMC selecting the BSD license for its open source projects, and the newly re-named xTuple introducing yet another license.
Read more »
- Login to post comments
SugarCRM Open Source Project Announces Adoption of GPLv3
http://www.sugarcrm.com –
UPERTINO, Calif. (July 25, 2007) - SugarCRM Inc., the world’s leading provider of commercial open source customer relationship management (CRM) software, today announced the upcoming release of Sugar Community Edition 5.0 will be licensed under the new Version 3 of the GNU General Public License (GPL). The GPL is the most widely used free and open source (FOSS) license in the market.
Read more »
Category: Legal Tags:
- Login to post comments
GPLv3 report: 21% increase, but some notable exceptions
http://blogs.cnet.com –
We're now at 199 projects that have adopted GPLv3, which represents a 21% increase over last week. Clearly, GPLv3 has legs. Significantly, Snort made the move this past week. This is a major coup for GPLv3.
Read more »- Login to post comments
Thinking / ranting on the GPL changes
http://www.kdedevelopers.org –
I have been working on providing Microsoft Exchange capability for Akonadi on-and-off for a while.There is an emerging problem though: GPLv2 and GPLv3 are not compatible. My code is fine - it is "GPLv2 or later". The incompatibility is that Qt is released under GPLv2 (not "or later")
Read more »
Category: High End Tags:
- Login to post comments
Should FOSS Change to a Dual License?
http://penguinpetes.com –
I would be happy to see one of two courses of action. Either: (a) Change the licenses to make an exception for running on Windows - namely that it is not permitted. (b) Change the licenses so that only the original author may port their own software to Windows - as proprietary only!
Read more »
Category: Legal Tags:
- Login to post comments
Digium will probably stick with GPLv2 for Asterisk
http://www.internetnews.com –
Digium will probably not switch from GPLv2 to GPLv3. They are concerned about the patent ramifications, and say they want to stick with what's known.
Read more »
Category: High End Tags:
- Login to post comments
