Novell makes more evident what was obvious from the very start - that it puts Microsoft's interests ahead of anything else

Three new examples of Novell's marketing staff praising and helping to sell Microsoft's sequel to Windows Vista

More evidence arrives showing that Novell is simply advancing Microsoft at the expense of GNU/Linux

Novell turns its attention to Microsoft's Visual Studio

Mono Tools lets Visual Studio developers use the Microsoft IDE for cross-platform application development

Novell markets Microsoft software along with its own and Novell's CMO talks about experimentation with viral marketing

On Friday, at the trial in SCO v. Novell, SCO told the judge that they'd file their response to Novell's Motion to Allow Evidence on Monday. And so they have:Novell seeks to present evidence to the jury in the form of snippets of text selectively lifted from prior judicial opinions in this case.

It seems Novell moved for mistrial on March 15 at the trial in SCO v. Novell. And there has been a decision on Novell's motion to allow evidence. The docket doesn't yet reflect the order on the motion to allow evidence, but you can see that it happened in this, the full text of the order on the oral motion by Novell for a mistrial...

Yesterday, at the end of the day at the trial of SCO v. Novell, there was a discussion of whether certain evidence could be let in after all, due to something SCO said. Judge Ted Stewart asked Novell to put it in the form of a motion, and they have. SCO accused Novell in its opening argument four times of slander of title "to this day".