Charlie writes: "Ok, this is the sh*t. Not only that, word has it, this is going to be open source. Of course, this is what some guy who reads some forum has emailed me, and I'm being completely sensational by posting it on an open source blog, but the youtubes are so cool that I can't help myself."
Full story »
Categories
Best karma users
Popular this week - High End
Popular today
- 16 FreeRunner Linux phone sells out, more on the way
- 13 Protecting against evil code fragments with HTML Purifier
- 13 GNU/Linux free software tools to preserve your online privacy, anonymity and security
- 13 Don't compare GNU/Linux with Windows or MacOS - they are not in the same game
- 12 School switches to Linux, hopes to keep MS funds
mawcs
20 weeks 22 hours 16 min 57 sec ago
Maybe not open source
The author says in the comments that he *has not* decided to release it has open source.
charlesgoodwin
20 weeks 21 hours 31 min 40 sec ago
Misleading comment
No, he said he has not decided whether to or not. Don't misquote. He's unsure.
mawcs
20 weeks 21 hours 22 min 53 sec ago
Don't misquote me!
I said "he *has not* decided..." I didn't say that he decided not to. There is a huge difference. The point is that the headline says that it "will" be open-sourced and that is incorrect. My comment clearly said "maybe not open source." See the "maybe?"
Try exercising your reading comprehension before claiming that I am "misleading."
charlesgoodwin
20 weeks 18 hours 37 min 28 sec ago
Ambiguous as anything
"He has not decided to release it as open source" is ambiguous.
e.g. He has not decided to release it as open source but instead decided to keep it closed source.
Speak with clarity then you will not be corrected.