Charlie writes: "Ok, this is the sh*t. Not only that, word has it, this is going to be open source. Of course, this is what some guy who reads some forum has emailed me, and I'm being completely sensational by posting it on an open source blog, but the youtubes are so cool that I can't help myself."
Full story »
mawcs
18 years 17 weeks 10 hours 2 min ago
Maybe not open source
The author says in the comments that he *has not* decided to release it has open source.
charlesgoodwin
18 years 17 weeks 9 hours 17 min ago
Misleading comment
No, he said he has not decided whether to or not. Don't misquote. He's unsure.
mawcs
18 years 17 weeks 9 hours 8 min ago
Don't misquote me!
I said "he *has not* decided..." I didn't say that he decided not to. There is a huge difference. The point is that the headline says that it "will" be open-sourced and that is incorrect. My comment clearly said "maybe not open source." See the "maybe?"
Try exercising your reading comprehension before claiming that I am "misleading."
charlesgoodwin
18 years 17 weeks 6 hours 22 min ago
Ambiguous as anything
"He has not decided to release it as open source" is ambiguous.
e.g. He has not decided to release it as open source but instead decided to keep it closed source.
Speak with clarity then you will not be corrected.