Hi, this is Bruce Perens. I need your signature to help me protect Open Source.

Full story »
dave's picture
Created by dave 11 years 29 weeks ago
Category: Community   Tags:
bogdanbiv's picture


11 years 29 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago


Why is "open source" still relevant?

Open source started out as a term for marketing the "free software" concept. But from the beginning there has been an argument from the free software supporters that the concept "open source" does not actually help the adoption of free software. The dissent has recently gone wider with the approval of several license as "open source", but which are not suitable for free software products (most remarkable in this category are the Microsoft licenses).

aboutblank's picture


11 years 29 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago


Microsoft's MS-PL and MS-RL

Microsoft's MS-PL and MS-RL are sufficiently free licences; I would have no ethical problem with contributing code under those licences. However, there are a number of other licences that already serve the same purpose as these licenses. Whenever we start new projects, we should use already established licences to combat licence proliferation.

Best karma users