Reader Chemisor advances a theory in his journal that a linguistic misunderstanding is at the root of many disagreements over different licensing philosophies, in particular BSD vs. GPL. The argument is that GPL adherents desire the freedom of their code, while those on the BSD side want freedom for their projects.
Full story »
Read contents from Free Software Magazine
Anybody up to writing good directory software?
Tue, 2007-02-20 11:17 — David JonathanSince the very beginning, directories (of any kind) have had a very central role in the internet. (I have recently grown fond of Free Web Directory. Even Slashdot can be considered a directory: a collection of great news and invaluable user-generated comments. As far as software is concerned, doing a quick search on Google about software directories will return the free (as in freedom) software directories like Savannah, SourceForge, Freshmeat and so on, followed by shareware and freeware sites such as FileBuzz, PCWin Download Center and All Freeware (great if you're looking for shareware and freeware, but definitely less comprehensive than their free-as-in-freedom counterparts).
Is better education the key to finding better software?
Sat, 2007-03-03 03:25 — Edward RusselI read David Jonathon's article Anybody Up To Writing Good Directory Software? the other day, which got me thinking about software directories in general. As David mentioned, many of the software directories one finds when doing a quick google search are free as in beer, not as in freedom. But what interests me is the software directories that already exist, providing a combination of both free as in beer software, and open source software. Sites such as Freeware Downloads and Shareware Download don't advertise themselves as providing free as in liberty software, but each of them have a good selection of open source software available... if you know where to look.
Categories
Best karma users
From the staff of FSDaily: Comedians in Perth, Magicians in Perth, Bands in Perth
aboutblank
3 years 45 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago
Liberal Free Software is More Free
I like this comment http://news.slashdot.org/news/08/07/08/1832255.shtml
I have concluded some time ago that liberally licensed free software is more free than freedom preserving copyleft licenses like the GNU GPL by the fact that liberal licenses have fewer restrictions than copyleft licenses.
I liken liberally licensed free software to that of the anarchist utopian society; sure there may be maximum freedom for all the residents, but the inherent nature of people means that someone will practise actions that will harm other people. The sociopaths and the aggressors of that society will use their liberty in order to further themselves at the price of other people's liberty.
I liken copyleft licenses (like the GNU GPL) to that of a society governed by rules; laws are established and any resident that has been caught breaking those rules are punished. The rules are established by the will of the society and individuals are punished by members of the same society in order to maintain relative peace and freedom in the society.
The liberally licensed free software is more free and that's fine in many cases. The purpose of the GPL means that while there is less total freedom for the participants, these rules exist to guarantee the essential freedoms to every single participant.
dave
3 years 45 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago
I agree with ModplanMan
This is a great comment... blog entry worthy for sure. Any chance you want to add this as a post?
aboutblank
3 years 45 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago
Better Link
Sorry people. The comment I wanted to show is this one http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=607389&cid=24112111
ModplanMan
3 years 45 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago
aboutblank
That is the most perfect comment ever *saves*. Personally, I also think that's why, as far as I understand the 2 licenses, the GPL is overall the more important.