Charlie writes: "Ok, this is the sh*t. Not only that, word has it, this is going to be open source. Of course, this is what some guy who reads some forum has emailed me, and I'm being completely sensational by posting it on an open source blog, but the youtubes are so cool that I can't help myself."
Full story »
mawcs
33 weeks 4 days 15 hours 6 min ago
Maybe not open source
The author says in the comments that he *has not* decided to release it has open source.
charlesgoodwin
33 weeks 4 days 14 hours 21 min ago
Misleading comment
No, he said he has not decided whether to or not. Don't misquote. He's unsure.
mawcs
33 weeks 4 days 14 hours 12 min ago
Don't misquote me!
I said "he *has not* decided..." I didn't say that he decided not to. There is a huge difference. The point is that the headline says that it "will" be open-sourced and that is incorrect. My comment clearly said "maybe not open source." See the "maybe?"
Try exercising your reading comprehension before claiming that I am "misleading."
charlesgoodwin
33 weeks 4 days 11 hours 27 min ago
Ambiguous as anything
"He has not decided to release it as open source" is ambiguous.
e.g. He has not decided to release it as open source but instead decided to keep it closed source.
Speak with clarity then you will not be corrected.