17

http://lists.gnu.org

"...So much effort still seems to be put into porting prorietary garbage like .NET to GNU, and producing a Gnome windowing environment which has all the faults of MS-Windows. Why not concentrate on producing something better. Emacs is far nicer to work with than GNOME. So why the interest in making Emacs fit in to this inferior MS-Windows like environment. Why not make GNOME work more like Emacs. Whats the point of a C based GTK it you don't use it through a Lisp like layer? Why is so much of my Gnome configuration buried in zillions of directories filled with ugly XML files. Why can't I query it with simple REPL? I don't have problems with porting Emacs to Vista. My problem is with
this strong desire to port Vista to GNU."

Full story »
can.axis's picture
Created by can.axis 3 years 43 weeks ago – Made popular 3 years 43 weeks ago
Category: High End   Tags:
can.axis's picture

can.axis

3 years 43 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago

2

GNOME was initially based on Scheme

RMS: « I agree with you there. The sad thing is that GNOME was initially based on Scheme, and it was possible to do these things. They do not listen to me much, so I save my efforts with them for the issues that are essential to our campaign for freedom. » -- source:
* http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-07/msg01324.html

kiba's picture

kiba

3 years 43 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago

1

Why this get voted

Why this get voted down?
-----Signature----
*Copyright creates monopolies. Copyleft promote the free market.

*"Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely"-- http://againstmonopoly.org

Ferk's picture

Ferk

3 years 43 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago

3

Sawfish!

Sawfish is written in Lisp, and it is already a featureful window manager.
It has been brought to life some time ao.. I think there should be more contributing to it, as it has the potential to end up being a really good window manager.
http://sawfish.wikia.com/

Read contents from Free Software Magazine

Anybody up to writing good directory software?

Tue, 2007-02-20 11:17 — David Jonathan

Since the very beginning, directories (of any kind) have had a very central role in the internet. (I have recently grown fond of Free Web Directory. Even Slashdot can be considered a directory: a collection of great news and invaluable user-generated comments. As far as software is concerned, doing a quick search on Google about software directories will return the free (as in freedom) software directories like Savannah, SourceForge, Freshmeat and so on, followed by shareware and freeware sites such as FileBuzz, PCWin Download Center and All Freeware (great if you're looking for shareware and freeware, but definitely less comprehensive than their free-as-in-freedom counterparts).

Is better education the key to finding better software?

Sat, 2007-03-03 03:25 — Edward Russel

I read David Jonathon's article Anybody Up To Writing Good Directory Software? the other day, which got me thinking about software directories in general. As David mentioned, many of the software directories one finds when doing a quick google search are free as in beer, not as in freedom. But what interests me is the software directories that already exist, providing a combination of both free as in beer software, and open source software. Sites such as Freeware Downloads and Shareware Download don't advertise themselves as providing free as in liberty software, but each of them have a good selection of open source software available... if you know where to look.

FSDaily uses Apollo project management software and CRM for its everyday activities!
From the staff of FSDaily: Comedians in Perth, Magicians in Perth, Bands in Perth