16

http://blogs.zdnet.com

Do people who pay $299 to $399 for a Linux notebook suffer greater levels of buyer’s remorse compared to those buying Windows machines?

Full story »
Jimbob's picture
Created by Jimbob 3 years 32 weeks ago – Made popular 3 years 32 weeks ago
Category: Business   Tags:
3rdalbum's picture

3rdalbum

3 years 32 weeks 19 hours 43 min ago

1

Marketing issue

It's a marketing and word-of-mouth problem that I observed first-hand. A friend of mine at my workplace (an electrical store) was looking to buy the first generation of EeePC for her son. She called the supplier to ask if they had stock of the EeePCs and the nice lady told her to wait until they came with Windows XP, "because it will be easier to use".

People are buying these netbooks and telling their friends, and their friends are saying "You shouldn't have got one with Linux, it's really hard to use". Even though the computer is sitting there in front of them and they had no trouble using it at the store, the customer will choose to believe their friend and they'll return it.

The other problem is that for somebody who's not computer-savvy, they could see the Linux model and think it's running Windows. It has a taskbar at the bottom of the screen and the window borders look like either Windows XP Luna or the XP Metal theme. They buy it, and then discover later that it's the Linux model that's been made up to look like Windows. That's one of the reasons why I like the Ubuntu Netbook interface; it's unmistakably Ubuntu.

You could also explain the return rate because the Linux machines are drawing in the people who just want to buy a computer based on price, more than the slightly more expensive Windows ones. They buy it and then realise that it doesn't have an optical drive or something. They return it and buy a full-sized laptop. Whereas the people who are willing to pay the extra for Windows XP probably already realise what the specifications are and what the machine can and cannot do.

Read contents from Free Software Magazine

Anybody up to writing good directory software?

Tue, 2007-02-20 11:17 — David Jonathan

Since the very beginning, directories (of any kind) have had a very central role in the internet. (I have recently grown fond of Free Web Directory. Even Slashdot can be considered a directory: a collection of great news and invaluable user-generated comments. As far as software is concerned, doing a quick search on Google about software directories will return the free (as in freedom) software directories like Savannah, SourceForge, Freshmeat and so on, followed by shareware and freeware sites such as FileBuzz, PCWin Download Center and All Freeware (great if you're looking for shareware and freeware, but definitely less comprehensive than their free-as-in-freedom counterparts).

Is better education the key to finding better software?

Sat, 2007-03-03 03:25 — Edward Russel

I read David Jonathon's article Anybody Up To Writing Good Directory Software? the other day, which got me thinking about software directories in general. As David mentioned, many of the software directories one finds when doing a quick google search are free as in beer, not as in freedom. But what interests me is the software directories that already exist, providing a combination of both free as in beer software, and open source software. Sites such as Freeware Downloads and Shareware Download don't advertise themselves as providing free as in liberty software, but each of them have a good selection of open source software available... if you know where to look.

FSDaily uses Apollo project management software and CRM for its everyday activities!
From the staff of FSDaily: Comedians in Perth, Magicians in Perth, Bands in Perth